Monday, November 30, 2009

Clean Energy Centers Growing Worldwide, Not in U.S.


Clean Energy Centers Growing Worldwide, Not in U.S.


The US could be a leader in innovative new energy development and technology, resulting in new jobs and cleaner energy, but instead the USA is losing it's leadership and other countries are forging ahead. We will be the losers and end up purchasing the techology from other that we could have developed and sold. It's a shame. We ought to be in the forefront, especially as one of the primary users of energy. 

Click on the above title to read more about this.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Overrated Optimism: The Peril of Positive Thinking

Overrated Optimism: The Peril of Positive Thinking

Like so many other psychological fads, overdoing positive thinking can lead to terrible results when we dump realism for unbridled optimism. this Barbara Ehrenreich piece is worth reading and thinking about.

As someone who was once accused of being negative on the job because I insisted on being realistic, I know how it feels to be pounced upon for looking at a situation with clear-eyed realism instead of unjustified enthusiasm.

Sometimes optimism and good cheer is wonderful; sometimes it's invaluable. And sometimes it's a trap.

Monday, October 5, 2009

For Those of You on Your Way to Church This Morning ...a note from Michael Moore | MichaelMoore.com

For Those of You on Your Way to Church This Morning ...a note from Michael Moore | MichaelMoore.com

Shared via AddThis

Michael Moore's essay is well worth reading and pondering. It echoes thoughts I have had for a long time. I wonder often how some of our people can profess to be Christians, not just because of greed and selfishness, but because of the way they look down on those who have less. We should be ashamed.

Sunday, September 27, 2009

Asteroid attack: Putting Earth's defences to the test - space - 23 September 2009 - New Scientist

Asteroid attack: Putting Earth's defences to the test - space - 23 September 2009 - New Scientist

Shared via AddThis

This article in New Scientist is mind-jarring. Until I saw Peter Garretson's (mentioned in this article as leading a Pentagon exercise to evaluate response capabilties) briefing a couple of years ago, I thought the possibility of an asteroid or large meteor striking earth and doing serious damage was primarily science fiction despite the fact that I had known about Meteor Crater in Arizona since I was a child.

There's not much use going around our daily lives panicked about the possibility of being wiped out by an asteroid collision, but we are foolish if we don't at least make what plans we can to minimize death, and look to the future for both notification of these "near earth objects" and what we might do to protect ourselves.

Asteroid Attack: Putting Earth's Defenses to the Test

It's not just science fiction. Excellent video that accompanies the article above.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Debtors Revolt Publicity Pays Off for Ann Minch

Debtors Revolt Publicity Pays Off for Ann Minch

Posted using ShareThis

Credit cards ought to be called by their right name: LOAN cards or DEBT cards. That's what we are really doing when we use them, taking out a loan and increasing our debt, but can you even imagine agreeing to a car loan at 25% interest? How about a home loan? NO WAY. But somehow, we are foolish enough to "agree" to interest rates like that on credit cards. Just using them means we "agree."

I pay off my balances every month. Never late. But today I got a letter from one of my card banks saying they were raising the interest rate on that card to over 25%. Imagine what that would mean if I didn't pay it off monthly. At even simple interest, a $100 item costs over $125 with a year's interest. Someone who runs a balance of $1000 is paying over $250 EXTRA for whatever they bought. Think what that extra $250 could buy you if you weren't paying it!

The banks are rushing to raise credit card interest rates as fast as they can before the new laws go into effect. They shot themselves in the proverbial feet by not only extending but PUSHING credit to people who could little afford it and who would be tempted to buy things they couldn't pay off, and now when they get a lot of defaults, the rest of us are paying for it.

I'm for this woman's revolt. DON'T PAY their exorbitant interest. If you use credit cards, use them wisely and pay them off monthly. If you can't pay them off, at least minimize the amount on the card and look for one that isn't charging you usurious rates. Where to find good information about better cards? Here's a reputable site that can help, and also has a lot of other excellent financial information:

bankrate.com

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Federal appeals court to decide suit over wounded veterans -- latimes.com

Federal appeals court to decide suit over wounded veterans -- latimes.com

Posted using ShareThis

It's pathetic that our wounded and sick veterans have to resort to a lawsuit to try to get the VA to process their claims and needs in a reasonably timely fashion, but as the judge says, he can't make that happen. The injuries and other service-connected health problems that are forced upon the members of our military services are one of the consequences of wars. Our goverment always pays great lip service to taking care of them, but when it comes to actually doing it, is unprepared and doesn't have the necessary money and facilities. Of course not . . . raising taxes is seen as anathema. They need to think about that when they send people to war.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Disgusted with the media

I'm thoroughly fed up with the media, and this evening, especially with television news. We have an entire world of important stories and issues and what do they spend hours and hours on? Again? Serena Williams and someone else's outbursts on the tennis court. Congressman Wilson's outburst during Obama's health care speech. And several other rude bloopers. On and on about apologies, and what should be done, and censures, fines, etc. This is ridiculous tempest-in-a-teapot journalism. Not one of these incidents is worth spending more than two minutes on. Instead, we are subjected to endless "reports" and discussions about them instead of anything actually important or substantive. Same with the death of Michael Jackson.

Come on people, get on with it. REPORT on something worth caring about and worth educating us about.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Free Press Calls on Obama Administration to Resist Extremism in the Media

WASHINGTON -- Van Jones, an adviser to the Obama administration and a former Free Press board member, resigned from his White House post after being ruthlessly attacked for weeks in a smear campaign started by Fox News pundit Glenn Beck. Beck, who has also called President Obama a "racist," targeted Jones for his background in environmental and civil rights activism.

Josh Silver, executive director of Free Press, issued the following statement:

"Most Americans want affordable health care, good schools and clean air. But if you watch Glenn Beck’s show, you would think the opposite is true: that the only proponents of these ideas are socialist, anti-American radicals operating out of the White House basement.

"At Free Press, our focus is on structural media policy, not on media content. But we take this extraordinary step because what’s happening is so poisonous to American political discourse.

"That Fox News Channel lets Beck use its media megaphone to stir up hatred and fear of others is repulsive, divisive and beyond all common sense or decency. By giving Beck a nightly platform for such McCarthy-esque witch hunts and smear campaigns, the national news network undermines our democracy. But Fox News is not alone. Unfortunately, this kind of rant is endemic to a media system that cares about ratings far more than about the truth.

"Beck has a First Amendment right to stoke prejudice, and we do not and will not support efforts to silence him. This is not about censorship; it’s about sanity. Our leaders have a responsibility to condemn fear mongering in all its forms, defend those who are unfairly attacked, and support a more diverse media system that provides alternative voices to the likes of Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and other extremists. The lesson from the shameful McCarthy era that culminated in 1954 is that we must confront the politics of personal attack with decency, reason and a commitment to more political speech, not less.

"It's time for our elected officials -- from the White House to local town halls -- to join people across the country in a stand against agents of fear and misinformation."



Posted using ShareThis

Joseph A. Palermo: Glenn Beck vs. Van Jones: McCarthyism Enters the 21st Century

Joseph A. Palermo: Glenn Beck vs. Van Jones: McCarthyism Enters the 21st Century

Posted using ShareThis

Thought-Provoking New York Times article on military members blogging and using social networks

Should our military members be allowed to use social networking like Facebook and MySpace? Should they be allowed to blog? This is an interesting conundrum for the military. Fascinating New York Times article.

This was posted on Facebook by the DAV but for those who don't subscribe there I'm passing it along. Years ago when I was a military wife, I wrote a column in a German newspaper. I did submit the columns to an army public affairs officer for review before publication, but I didn't realize until sometime after I started that my columns were making it into the briefing books of the main army Europe command. No one ever tried to stop me, though I also never wrote anything detrimental to the army, the US, or OPSEC (for you civilians, that's Operation Security, referring to the need to keep sensitive information about military operations close-hold, not that I had any knowledge of anything OPSEC sensitive in the first place). I know people who are currently serving our country who use social networking and blog on them, and I wonder how they will be affected. I, for one, WANT to be able to read what the troops have to say.

The issue of freedom of speech is complicated when it comes to the military, who often give up some of the freedoms they fight for.

BTW, I believe the blog mentioned in the beginning of this article is by invitation only and not for the general internet public. If that's not correct, I apologize.

Some military bloggers do cloak their identities, as do some civilian bloggers.

Shocking Article on Debit Card Fees from the New York Times

Overspending on Debit Cards is a Boon for Banks

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Bravo Laura Bush!

Just yesterday I said that I wished that Laura Bush, as a former school librarian and educator, would come out in support of President Obama's address to school students and today she did. Bravo, Laura. Her husband, President George W. Bush, addressed school students, too, as did President Reagan. It's terrific that presidents engage our young people.

Monday, September 7, 2009

Friday, September 4, 2009

Gibbs: Resistance to Obama school speech just plain ’silly’ | csmonitor.com

Gibbs: Resistance to Obama school speech just plain ’silly’ | csmonitor.com

Posted using ShareThis

Now I know too many people in our country have totally taken leave of their senses. When the President of the United States can't give a back-to-school speech encouraging kids to learn, study and stay in school without people getting upset, we have reached a new and foolish low. Those that say the President is playing politics with this ought to go look in the mirror and feel ashamed. We should be thankful we have a president that cares enough about the kids in our country to express these thoughts to them.

The Republican (Catholic church) Captivity | National Catholic Reporter

The Republican (Catholic church) Captivity | National Catholic Reporter

Shared via AddThis

Lack of data hinders prevention efforts | IndyStar.com | The Indianapolis Star

Lack of data hinders prevention efforts | IndyStar.com | The Indianapolis Star

Posted using ShareThis
A 2008 Congressional Research Service Report on the issue put it bluntly: "There is no nationwide system for surveillance of suicide specifically among veterans."
How can the rising numbers of suicides among our military veterans be prevented? It's terrible enough that they suffer in war, are sent away from their families, and deal with PTSD and injury, but then to die by their own hand because of their suffering, how terrible for them, their families, for all of us.

'Surge home' overwhelms Veterans Affairs clinics | csmonitor.com

'Surge home' overwhelms Veterans Affairs clinics | csmonitor.com

Posted using ShareThis

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Why so scared of the "public option"?

The fear of the so-called public option for universal health care is ridiculous. Medicare is a public option. I don't see seniors out campaigning to get rid of Medicare, complaining of rationed care or not being able to choose a doctor. Instead I know people who are anxious to become 65 so they can have Medicare.

Instead of I know people who have employer-sponsored or other private health care plans that require them to use only network doctors (not much doctor choice there!) or the plan either doesn't cover them or covers only a small percentage of the cost.

Instead I know people whose medical insurance plans don't cover needed services or only allow so many visits for a particular condition. Talk about rationed care!

The idea that the health insurance companies (translate, "big business" in it for huge profits) either could or would "do things better" is nonsense. They've had YEARS to do it better and haven't made the effort. Too much money in business as usual. They are behind the campaign to get rid of a public option because they are scared they will not have profits as high as they do now. People might begin to see through the smoke screen.

The idea that government is always a bad choice is also foolish. I don't see the public screaming that we should get out of national defense (the military), law enforcement (from the FBI to the courts, from local police to state troopers) because private enterprise can do it better. I don't see the public screaming to replace the federal highway system (federally administered but contracted to contractors) with a hodgepodge of business interests.

From what I have seen, my friends and relatives on Medicare have more choice of doctors and hospitals and less rationing of care than those on many of the private plans sponsored by employers.

My family has had federal health care insurance for over 40 years due to military service. Whatever problems we've had weren't the result of the insurance, and we are very grateful for the health care we have received. We have a choice of three plans with varying copay and deductible arrangements. One is an HMO plan.

We are extremely thankful that we have not had to fear a lack of affordable medical care or going broke because of a family illness or injury. We would like to see that kind of security and freedom extended to everyone in our country.

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Noise pollution!

I'm all for saving trees and reducing waste but what about noise pollution and hearing damage? So many places are using incredibly LOUD electrc hand dryers and auto-flushing toilets that I'm pretty sure the decibels are way higher than needed to damage hearing. And too many of those self-flushing toilets flush repeatedly and unnecessarily, wasting precious water.

Saturday, July 11, 2009

US Reputation for Scientific Achievement Flagging

U.S. science, medicine and technology were under the microscope in the latest survey from the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, and one finding that's generating headlines is that only 17 percent of the public participants held the belief that American scientific achievements are the best in the world.

Posted using ShareThis

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

"Outsourcing" Jobs to Machines

In the past few years we've heard a lot about the outsourcing of American jobs to lower paid workers in foreign countries and there's been some outrage over it, but where do you hear any outrage over the loss of jobs to machines?

This morning I was at the local post office and instead of four clerks on duty, there was one. I waited 20 minutes in line and listened to an exchange between the lone clerk and another one who was supposed to get behind the counter as well but was rushing around doing other jobs that were on his list of duties such as replenishing the supplies of everything from passport application forms and delivery confirmation forms to instructions on how to do an online change of address. He remarked to those of us in line that if we didn't want to wait, there was always the machine in the lobby, the "APC" or automated postal center. He said it could do everything they could do.

I am a frequent postal customer and because I send a lot of orders by Media Mail, I stand in line because the APC doesn't do that feature (although if you know what amount of postage you need, you could purchase stamps for that amount). By the time it was my turn, he was behind the counter and I told him that the APC didn't talk to us. He said, yeah, there will always be a certain number of people who want that kind of personal service, but that "there will never be four of us behind the counter at once again because the postal service wants people to use the machines." They are, of course, cheaper than humans.

It isn't quite true that the machine can do everything a clerk can do, but it can do most of it. However, they don't always work, as I've discovered on at least two occasions.

His remark about reducing the number of clerks serving the public prompted me to remark about how many jobs are being lost, beginning years ago with gasoline stations. When I was a teen, there were plenty of teenage boys who had their first jobs at gas stations, pumping gas, checking tire pressure, washing windshields and checking oil levels. That used to be the accepted standard service at any "filling station." Free maps, too. I miss those days. At least I KNEW that my oil and tire pressure were getting checked regularly and didn't have to remind myself to do it, and a lot of young men had jobs that no longer exist for them.

That got me started. Think about it. Banks have fewer tellers. You use an ATM. Big stores are adding self-checkout lanes where no cashier is needed. Even libraries are adding self checkout machines.

It could be argued that all of this is progress, convenient, efficient, reduces lines (for now anyway) and cuts business costs. However, none of those machines can answer questions, solve problems, or fix themselves when they break down . . . or operate when the electricity goes off. Business may like not having to pay employees or the payroll taxes and benefits that go with them, but they are reducing service. The public may like (some of them, anyway) the convenience and time saved (until they get stuck on a broken machine!), but what are we losing?

We are losing JOBS. We are losing HUMAN CONTACT.

It isn't just the outsourcing of jobs or the recession that is taking away jobs. It's replacement by machines, too.

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Bottled drinks

Here's an idea that's overdue: bottled drinks that are half the size of those being sold now, which are way too big for kids and small adults and take forever to drink, or get wasted.

Monday, June 29, 2009

No mass movement

If the prospect of so-called socialized medicine is so awful, why aren't the
Millions on Medicare and other federal insurance like that for federal employees and the military on Tricare all clamoring to get rid if it and go private?

If the private sector can do it so much better, why haven't they? They have certainly had years of ample opportunity.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Why solve any of our problems?

I am so disgusted with both the politicians and much of our population. It seems no one is willing to compromise to find solutions. No one is willing to give an inch to make better things possible. No one wants to govern for the benefit of all, just to advance an agenda. We are like lung cancer patients that insist on continuing to smoke. We are not ostriches with our heads in the sand. . . we SEE the problems, but we, as a society, are just so determined not to solve them. It seems to be far more important to follow a party line, not to give up any of our "living standard" or our wasteful ways, than to face reality. No matter what anyone proposes, the opposition not only begins to campaign against it, they imput evil motives to the other side.

Take the health care crisis and the need for universal medical insurance. Those against it insist that it will be a disaster, that we will have "rationed" medical care, that doctors will be "government employees," that you will have to wait in line for care until you die. First of all, I completely doubt the likelihood of these scary stories coming true. If so, why aren't all the people over 65 clamoring for the repeal of Medicare? If a government administered plan is so bad, why are all of us older folks so glad we have it? Why are so many physicians willing to accept it? Why are so many private companies happy to sell supplement policies? Ever meet a senior who is refusing to use his Medicare benefits?

Try telling all those that have NO health insurance that a government plan would be so terrible for them. They have NO insurance now and can't afford to get care. If they go to an emergency room, they are charged premium rates because there is no insurance to negotiate a rate for them. If they can't pay, they are stuck with terrible debts. They do die standing in line for care. And there are more of them every day.

Try telling the families that have a government health care insurance for their children that it's a bad thing, that they should refuse it. it may not be perfect, and nothing created by man ever is, but it's far better than nothing.

Then let's look at our energy problems, our infrastructure problems, our financial industry problems, our trade problems. The same thinking applies. We can't solve any of them because we can't agree. As a society we are more interested in arguing our points that figuring out what works.

We will go to our doom arguing about our problems when we could have fixed them, improved them, or at least tried.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Socialism -- unless you like it

I'm finding it rather disingenuous the way so many "conservatives" are screaming about how we don't want "socialized medicine," and yet try taking away social security or Medicare. As my son was fond of pointing out, we don's use the word socialism when we talk about our communal defense forces, our communal fire departments, our community schools. We aren't clamoring for the privatization of any of them. Can you imagine the mess if you had to find your own private police department, your own private fire department, and so on and on? Of course, there will always be those who can contract for extra high priced protection such as their own bodyguards, but we seem to agree as a society that we should provide "for the common defense." My son was also fond of pointing out that there aren't many things more directly connected with promoting "the general welfare," as the constitution says, than providing basic health care.

Today I was in a dentist's office. She was making negative comments about how the health care insurance problems will get worse if the government is involved. My comment was to tell that to the people who have no insurance now.

There are also ready forces campaigning to stop universal health care using the usual scare tactics, making it sound like there will be a sudden scarcity of both doctors and medical care. Why? Are all the doctors going to quit practicing? They make it sound as though you'll have no choice about what doctor you see. Why? You can always pay for your own care if you don't like what the insurance will offer. My son worked for the health care industry. His was passionately in favor of universal health care and said that what would develop is what has developed elsewhere . . . basic covered services for nearly all of us, and those with more resources will be able to get a higher tier of care on their own money, just as they do now.

Socialism? Not any more so than so many other things we do as a society (hmmm .. society -- socialism, sounds linked) and don't feel required to label as socialist. Building roads, bridges, harbors, for instance. But maybe you'd like them to be private, too.Medica

Monday, May 25, 2009

Websites Pet Peeve

It's a small thing -- TOO small a thing. Why is it that web designers insist on making the "logout" link on nearly every website so TINY and hard to find? We're supposed to log out of sites we have logged into, and you'd think they'd want us to follow through with that for our own security, but they sure make it harder. It should be easy to find a logout button or link. Not only easy, OBVIOUS. Logging IN isn't hidden in miniscule text. Logging IN gets nice text boxes, prominence.

Plain old logic and business sense teaches us that if you want people to do something, make it easy for them. So, web designers, make logging out EASY.

Saturday, May 16, 2009

Hotels and laundering towels

Many hotels I've been in the past few years have laudably posted signs that we can help the environment (and their costs, of course) by using towels more than one day, that if we wish to do that, to hang up the towels. If we want fresh towels, to leave them on the floor. However, I have found that at just about everyone, even IF I hang them up, the maids STILL change them for fresh towels. I don't know whether this is a training issue or a language issue, or whether something else is at work, but the signs aren't working.

The other thing that prevents it from being a successful campaign is the lack of good towel racks to hang the towels ON. Most hotels have these skimpy racks that work fine for folded towels but are lousy for hanging wet towels that need to be dried. There's never enough space for them. I imagine more people would be willing to use the same towels the next day if they thought they had a prayer of drying. I've even tried hanging them on hangers in the closet, when there were ENOUGH hangars, another rarity.

So, there's one of my pet peeves. If they really want this campaign to be successful, save water (a critical issue here in Florida where we are in the midst of a drought), save money, and benefit the environment, they need to train their maids to FOLLOW the rules and put decent towel bars in the rooms.

I think I've written about this before, on this blog, and I've sent it to Ann Landers or Dear Abby, too. Maybe someone will "listen."

Where did the ambition go?

I have sadly neglected this blog in the past year, dealing with my son's death, writing a daily blog about him and our experiences, our sadness, at his death. In January, I posted here that I felt a renewed ambition, but it did not last. I remained committed to the blog about him, not to continuing this one about other subjects. I still am focused on his remembrance blog and probably will be for a long time to come.

That doesn't mean I don't think about anything else, that I don't have opinions about the current political scene, world events, local news. It does mean there isn't energy enough and time to do both, not for now. So, although I may post from time to time, it won't be consistent, though I hope that that day will come.

Friday, January 2, 2009

Renewed Ambition

I began this blog one year ago, and initially I did well at my goal of posting nearly every day. However, a family tragedy in April, the death of our son Leif, not only took away my interest in writing this blog, but took away any time I had for it as well.

Instead, I began writing a blog about his life and death, and our feelings about them. I'm still writing Remembering Leif, and will continue it, but at last I am feeling more interest in other writing and life in general, so one of my New Year's resolutions is to begin writing again, here on Exconsulto, and also other writing for publication. I hope I will be able to stick with that.

There was so much to write about in 2008, the political scene, the economic disasters, and I had much to say, but that is now OBE, as they say in the military (overcome by events) and I am not going to look back.