'Surge home' overwhelms Veterans Affairs clinics | csmonitor.com
Posted using ShareThis
Friday, September 4, 2009
Thursday, September 3, 2009
Why so scared of the "public option"?
The fear of the so-called public option for universal health care is ridiculous. Medicare is a public option. I don't see seniors out campaigning to get rid of Medicare, complaining of rationed care or not being able to choose a doctor. Instead I know people who are anxious to become 65 so they can have Medicare.
Instead of I know people who have employer-sponsored or other private health care plans that require them to use only network doctors (not much doctor choice there!) or the plan either doesn't cover them or covers only a small percentage of the cost.
Instead I know people whose medical insurance plans don't cover needed services or only allow so many visits for a particular condition. Talk about rationed care!
The idea that the health insurance companies (translate, "big business" in it for huge profits) either could or would "do things better" is nonsense. They've had YEARS to do it better and haven't made the effort. Too much money in business as usual. They are behind the campaign to get rid of a public option because they are scared they will not have profits as high as they do now. People might begin to see through the smoke screen.
The idea that government is always a bad choice is also foolish. I don't see the public screaming that we should get out of national defense (the military), law enforcement (from the FBI to the courts, from local police to state troopers) because private enterprise can do it better. I don't see the public screaming to replace the federal highway system (federally administered but contracted to contractors) with a hodgepodge of business interests.
From what I have seen, my friends and relatives on Medicare have more choice of doctors and hospitals and less rationing of care than those on many of the private plans sponsored by employers.
My family has had federal health care insurance for over 40 years due to military service. Whatever problems we've had weren't the result of the insurance, and we are very grateful for the health care we have received. We have a choice of three plans with varying copay and deductible arrangements. One is an HMO plan.
We are extremely thankful that we have not had to fear a lack of affordable medical care or going broke because of a family illness or injury. We would like to see that kind of security and freedom extended to everyone in our country.
Instead of I know people who have employer-sponsored or other private health care plans that require them to use only network doctors (not much doctor choice there!) or the plan either doesn't cover them or covers only a small percentage of the cost.
Instead I know people whose medical insurance plans don't cover needed services or only allow so many visits for a particular condition. Talk about rationed care!
The idea that the health insurance companies (translate, "big business" in it for huge profits) either could or would "do things better" is nonsense. They've had YEARS to do it better and haven't made the effort. Too much money in business as usual. They are behind the campaign to get rid of a public option because they are scared they will not have profits as high as they do now. People might begin to see through the smoke screen.
The idea that government is always a bad choice is also foolish. I don't see the public screaming that we should get out of national defense (the military), law enforcement (from the FBI to the courts, from local police to state troopers) because private enterprise can do it better. I don't see the public screaming to replace the federal highway system (federally administered but contracted to contractors) with a hodgepodge of business interests.
From what I have seen, my friends and relatives on Medicare have more choice of doctors and hospitals and less rationing of care than those on many of the private plans sponsored by employers.
My family has had federal health care insurance for over 40 years due to military service. Whatever problems we've had weren't the result of the insurance, and we are very grateful for the health care we have received. We have a choice of three plans with varying copay and deductible arrangements. One is an HMO plan.
We are extremely thankful that we have not had to fear a lack of affordable medical care or going broke because of a family illness or injury. We would like to see that kind of security and freedom extended to everyone in our country.
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Monday, August 17, 2009
Monday, August 10, 2009
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Noise pollution!
I'm all for saving trees and reducing waste but what about noise pollution and hearing damage? So many places are using incredibly LOUD electrc hand dryers and auto-flushing toilets that I'm pretty sure the decibels are way higher than needed to damage hearing. And too many of those self-flushing toilets flush repeatedly and unnecessarily, wasting precious water.
Saturday, July 11, 2009
US Reputation for Scientific Achievement Flagging
U.S. science, medicine and technology were under the microscope in the latest survey from the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, and one finding that's generating headlines is that only 17 percent of the public participants held the belief that American scientific achievements are the best in the world.
Posted using ShareThis
Posted using ShareThis
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
"Outsourcing" Jobs to Machines
In the past few years we've heard a lot about the outsourcing of American jobs to lower paid workers in foreign countries and there's been some outrage over it, but where do you hear any outrage over the loss of jobs to machines?
This morning I was at the local post office and instead of four clerks on duty, there was one. I waited 20 minutes in line and listened to an exchange between the lone clerk and another one who was supposed to get behind the counter as well but was rushing around doing other jobs that were on his list of duties such as replenishing the supplies of everything from passport application forms and delivery confirmation forms to instructions on how to do an online change of address. He remarked to those of us in line that if we didn't want to wait, there was always the machine in the lobby, the "APC" or automated postal center. He said it could do everything they could do.
I am a frequent postal customer and because I send a lot of orders by Media Mail, I stand in line because the APC doesn't do that feature (although if you know what amount of postage you need, you could purchase stamps for that amount). By the time it was my turn, he was behind the counter and I told him that the APC didn't talk to us. He said, yeah, there will always be a certain number of people who want that kind of personal service, but that "there will never be four of us behind the counter at once again because the postal service wants people to use the machines." They are, of course, cheaper than humans.
It isn't quite true that the machine can do everything a clerk can do, but it can do most of it. However, they don't always work, as I've discovered on at least two occasions.
His remark about reducing the number of clerks serving the public prompted me to remark about how many jobs are being lost, beginning years ago with gasoline stations. When I was a teen, there were plenty of teenage boys who had their first jobs at gas stations, pumping gas, checking tire pressure, washing windshields and checking oil levels. That used to be the accepted standard service at any "filling station." Free maps, too. I miss those days. At least I KNEW that my oil and tire pressure were getting checked regularly and didn't have to remind myself to do it, and a lot of young men had jobs that no longer exist for them.
That got me started. Think about it. Banks have fewer tellers. You use an ATM. Big stores are adding self-checkout lanes where no cashier is needed. Even libraries are adding self checkout machines.
It could be argued that all of this is progress, convenient, efficient, reduces lines (for now anyway) and cuts business costs. However, none of those machines can answer questions, solve problems, or fix themselves when they break down . . . or operate when the electricity goes off. Business may like not having to pay employees or the payroll taxes and benefits that go with them, but they are reducing service. The public may like (some of them, anyway) the convenience and time saved (until they get stuck on a broken machine!), but what are we losing?
We are losing JOBS. We are losing HUMAN CONTACT.
It isn't just the outsourcing of jobs or the recession that is taking away jobs. It's replacement by machines, too.
This morning I was at the local post office and instead of four clerks on duty, there was one. I waited 20 minutes in line and listened to an exchange between the lone clerk and another one who was supposed to get behind the counter as well but was rushing around doing other jobs that were on his list of duties such as replenishing the supplies of everything from passport application forms and delivery confirmation forms to instructions on how to do an online change of address. He remarked to those of us in line that if we didn't want to wait, there was always the machine in the lobby, the "APC" or automated postal center. He said it could do everything they could do.
I am a frequent postal customer and because I send a lot of orders by Media Mail, I stand in line because the APC doesn't do that feature (although if you know what amount of postage you need, you could purchase stamps for that amount). By the time it was my turn, he was behind the counter and I told him that the APC didn't talk to us. He said, yeah, there will always be a certain number of people who want that kind of personal service, but that "there will never be four of us behind the counter at once again because the postal service wants people to use the machines." They are, of course, cheaper than humans.
It isn't quite true that the machine can do everything a clerk can do, but it can do most of it. However, they don't always work, as I've discovered on at least two occasions.
His remark about reducing the number of clerks serving the public prompted me to remark about how many jobs are being lost, beginning years ago with gasoline stations. When I was a teen, there were plenty of teenage boys who had their first jobs at gas stations, pumping gas, checking tire pressure, washing windshields and checking oil levels. That used to be the accepted standard service at any "filling station." Free maps, too. I miss those days. At least I KNEW that my oil and tire pressure were getting checked regularly and didn't have to remind myself to do it, and a lot of young men had jobs that no longer exist for them.
That got me started. Think about it. Banks have fewer tellers. You use an ATM. Big stores are adding self-checkout lanes where no cashier is needed. Even libraries are adding self checkout machines.
It could be argued that all of this is progress, convenient, efficient, reduces lines (for now anyway) and cuts business costs. However, none of those machines can answer questions, solve problems, or fix themselves when they break down . . . or operate when the electricity goes off. Business may like not having to pay employees or the payroll taxes and benefits that go with them, but they are reducing service. The public may like (some of them, anyway) the convenience and time saved (until they get stuck on a broken machine!), but what are we losing?
We are losing JOBS. We are losing HUMAN CONTACT.
It isn't just the outsourcing of jobs or the recession that is taking away jobs. It's replacement by machines, too.
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Bottled drinks
Here's an idea that's overdue: bottled drinks that are half the size of those being sold now, which are way too big for kids and small adults and take forever to drink, or get wasted.
Monday, July 6, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
